People served
Across the campus between 2010 and 2024.
Haven for Hope shows that homelessness can be addressed as a coordinated civic system, not a collection of disconnected programs.
It is a shared operating platform for public safety, courts, hospitals, behavioral health, housing, workforce, schools, philanthropy, faith groups, and nonprofit partners.
The physical campus matters because it makes coordination practical. The deeper value comes from common data, shared training, partner agreements, housing pathways, and the discipline to measure what happens after people leave.
Most of the people who stayed at Haven were able to resolve their homelessness through a single visit.Haven for Hope, A Blueprint for Hope
Across the campus between 2010 and 2024.
34,059 people used Haven only once across the 15-year study period.
Single-stay clients stayed out of homelessness across the measured time windows.
Based on a 108-day average stay and $37.70 average cost per bed night.
Fifty organizations maintained a physical presence on the Haven campus and 38 more participated through referral in the 2025 blueprint analysis.
Organizations keep their own boards, missions, and expertise while working inside a shared system.
Training in trauma-informed, recovery-oriented, person-centered care establishes a consistent culture.
Data across agencies allows partners to coordinate services and track whether exits last.
Keep immediate shelter accessible while protecting the recovery and family environment required for deeper work.
Use shared intake, coordinated entry, referrals, service records, and retention measures as core infrastructure.
Co-location works when space, staffing, security, training, meetings, funding, and handoffs are explicit.
Deposits, initial rent, landlord engagement, transportation, and move-out kits help translate readiness into housing.
Track whether people remain housed and treat a return as a signal for renewed support, not a moral failure.
Haven’s published cost-benefit analysis estimates community benefits from medical care, housing, crime reduction, lifetime earnings, school stability, and other outcomes. H2HH presents this as evidence for the San Antonio model, not as a guaranteed return for Houston.